Editorial Article

Tolerance and the First and Second Amendments

By Tarek Lucien Radjef

Amendment 1

– Freedom of Religion, Speech, and the Press

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment 2

– The Right to Bear Arms

A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Let’s look at the two Amendments.

We The People

We repeatedly hear about the second amendment. It gives room for diverging interpretations which are used to prevent common sense laws to be enacted about guns.

However, the first amendment rarely makes the news; it is sometimes quoted when claiming freedom of the press. I believe this is the amendment the most violated by the folks representing the Right.

With your permission, let’s look at the first three directives, even though the fourth has had occasional police enforcement issues.

“No law respecting an establishment of religion.” The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by the socialist minister Francis Bellamy. In 1954, President Eisenhower, afraid of the Communist threat, initiated adding the words “under God.” Bellamy’s daughter objected to the addition and so do the non-religious among us.

“…or prohibiting the free exercise thereof (religion).” In our own county, it took the threat of a lawsuit to allow members of the Muslim community to secure land for a cemetery.  Anti-Semitism is a flagrant violation of the first amendment.  Non-Christian religious individuals are often harassed in public places. It is both intentionally and unconsciously validated in the press, on television and the internet by an influential conservative faction. It is part of our responsibility as Democrats to elect folks who reject all forms of discrimination.

Semites are not only those of Jewish faith:

Definition of Semite by Merriam-Webster: 1a: A member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews and Arabs. 1b: a descendant of these peoples.

As the definition states, Arabs and Hebrews are Semites. Jesus was a Semite. The followers of the three Abrahamic faiths are told that they are the descendants of Shem. He was one of the sons of Noah as reported in the Hebrew Bible as well as in the Arabic KoranThe children of Shem were Elam, Ashur, ArphaxadLud and Aram, in addition to daughters. Abraham, the patriarch of the Hebrews and the Arabs, was one of the descendants of Arphaxad.

Finally,

“…or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press.” This is the part for which this amendment is most mentionedWhat would the framers of our Constitution do with the recently coined “Fake News?”

Don’t forget to vote.  The choices you make of local leaders have direct impact on your daily lives.

Comments 2

  1. A couple of points:

    The term “antisemitism” was coined in 1889 by the German journalist and founder of the Society of Antisemites, Wilhelm Marr to mean hatred of Jews as a class. This event marks the beginning of the belief that Jews constitute a supposed “race” to be hated and despised as such. Hostility by Westerners toward the Arabic-speaking peoples is generally called anti-arabism. The proper use of the term Semite, however, refers to a family of languages that includes Hebrew, Aramaic, and Arabic.

    This year, all candidates for office must be confronted with two choices.
    The first is between two interpretations of the Second Amendment. Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association claims that the right to keep and bear arms is an absolute and unalienable right. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in Heller v. D.C. that the right to keep and bear arms is an individual and personal right but a limited and regulatable one.
    With whom does each office-seeker stand? With Scalia or with LaPierre?

    Shortly after 9.11.2001, President Geo. W. Bush addressed Congress. He said that Islam was a noble and peaceful religion, and that the terrorists who had perpetrated that crime and other acts of mass murder had hijacked Islam for their evil purposes. Thus one could not blame Muslims as a group for these acts of terror. More recently Mr. Donald Trump has said that he believes that Islam itself hates America. With whom does each office seeker of any party stand? With Trump or with Bush?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *